I wondered what their angle would be for the suit, and the author comments:
> They’re planning to file this week, and the lawsuit is primarily about the President’s power to create tariffs at whim. They’re specifically interested in any businesses directly impacted by the tariffs.
So it looks like it's attacking the way a (plainly, transparently bullshit) "emergency" is being used to invoke emergency powers to levy tariffs purely on the President's authority, including in ways that are totally unrelated to and not even justified in rhetoric by the "emergency".
IOW it reads like this is an attack on the core legal mechanism by which he's doing all this, not some narrower question.
FYI if anyone wants a rundown of what's wrong with that article, there's both a good explanation in another linked article in that HN thread, and the comments on the blog itself (scroll way down) do a pretty thorough job of explaining how and in what ways it's amazingly, but confidently and smugly, wrong.
I think they might be getting a lot of traffic due to this post. It was loading for me right before I submitted this, but it's not now.
Full text in case it goes down again:
We are joining a lawsuit will challenge the President's unchecked authority to impose tariffs. We will not stand idly by while our livelihoods--and the livelihoods of thousands of small business owners and contractors in the US, along with the customers whose pursuit of happiness we hold dear--are treated like pawns in a political game.
Like many tabletop publishers (import code 9504.90.6000*), we started print runs of products before the President took office, and now we face an unprecedented $14.50 tariff tax for every $10 we spent on manufacturing with our trusted long-term partner in China. For Stonemaier Games alone (a US based company in which all 8 employees are US citizens), that amounts to upcoming tariff payments of nearly $1.5 million.
If the tariffs are damaging your business as well, please contact me at jamey@stonemaier.com and I will connect you with the law firm. There is no cost to join the lawsuit.
I try to lead with compassion and empathy, so legal action is very low on my list of ways to handle difficult situations. But with this new norm of a 145% tariff imposed by the President on all exports from China to the US--including products that have been in the manufacturing process for months--we are compelled to take action.
Of course, this isn't the only action we're taking, as we have 200,000 units of reprints and 50,000 units of Vantage (plus 57,000 other Vantage accessories) ready to ship out of Shenzhen in a few weeks. Here's what else we're doing in regards to these fully manufactured products:
We're selling to other countries: Around 35% of our annual sales are to distributors, retailers, and consumers outside of the US. We ship directly from China to those distributors and fulfillment centers, so the tariffs will not impact our prices in those regions.
We're storing the US quantities in China: For now, we will pay for warehousing in China store most of the US-bound products in the hopes that the tariffs will decrease by the time we need that inventory to replenish our supply in the US.
We're sending out-of-stock US quantities to the US: Finspan is out of stock in the US, so we are proceeding to send the restock as scheduled. We will eat most of the tariff cost (which more than doubles our costs) to minimize the impact on distributors, retailers, and consumers.
We're sending direct-sale Vantage to the US: I've spent too long trying to make this game affordable that I'm not going to let one person with unchecked power get in the way of me serving my customers. The tariffs may have a slight impact on the US price, but the plan is to largely keep our direct price the same and give customers the option to cover the tariff cost at checkout. The plan to release Vantage to US distribution and retail may need a delay--the lack of margins there have a bigger impact on a new game than on reprints.
Again, these strategies are focused on products we have already manufactured, as the tariffs did not carve out a grace period for such products. We are fortunate to have a buffer at Stonemaier Games to weather this storm, and my heart goes out to the many other small businesses--in the US and beyond--who invested their resources in products that they can no longer afford to bring into the US.
*There is an article circulating that states incorrectly that tariffs on tabletop games are only 20%. The (unfortunately) correct number is 145%.
I wondered what their angle would be for the suit, and the author comments:
> They’re planning to file this week, and the lawsuit is primarily about the President’s power to create tariffs at whim. They’re specifically interested in any businesses directly impacted by the tariffs.
So it looks like it's attacking the way a (plainly, transparently bullshit) "emergency" is being used to invoke emergency powers to levy tariffs purely on the President's authority, including in ways that are totally unrelated to and not even justified in rhetoric by the "emergency".
IOW it reads like this is an attack on the core legal mechanism by which he's doing all this, not some narrower question.
> *There is an article circulating that states incorrectly that tariffs on tabletop games are only 20%. The (unfortunately) correct number is 145%.
The article in question was posted here yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43751514
FYI if anyone wants a rundown of what's wrong with that article, there's both a good explanation in another linked article in that HN thread, and the comments on the blog itself (scroll way down) do a pretty thorough job of explaining how and in what ways it's amazingly, but confidently and smugly, wrong.
Getting a nginx error when visiting the page.
I think they might be getting a lot of traffic due to this post. It was loading for me right before I submitted this, but it's not now.
Full text in case it goes down again: